Looking for sex without commitment?

Find Hot People Blogs

October 24, 2011

Wingwoman Offers Guys 6 Dating Tips

Filed under: feel, girls, guys, life, nice, women — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 3:34 pm

By Marni Kinrys

The ultimate ’wing girl,’ Marni is a self-taught advice and relationship expert to men worldwide. Kinrys is the mind behind The Wing Girl Method and “The Playbook of What Women Want.”

(CNN) — You have to think about picking up girls the exact same way you think about picking up a box. You just do it. Seriously. After working with thousands of men all around the world, I have found that the common issue holding men back with women is that “thing” on top of their shoulders. It thinks, analyzes and makes excuses, so rejection is self-inflicted before women even get a chance to do it.

Here are six secrets men need to know about women to help them stop that “thing” in their head from destroying their dating life:

Women have baggage, too, especially the attractive ones. You think insecurity and low confidence are only for those who are fat, bald and ugly? Not so, my friend. Just because a woman is hot does not mean that her life is perfect. Remember, beauty does not equal perfection. It’s simply one thing about a woman that she literally wears on her sleeve.

Women prefer personality to looks. As a woman, I know this to be very true. But I also know it’s a tough one for men to swallow. Obviously, in the first five seconds, she judges a man based on his looks. But after that, something interesting happens: A man’s face shifts according to how he makes a woman feel. A hot man can become hideous, and an average-looking man can become the sexiest guy in the room. What women are really attracted to has nothing to do with appearance. It has to do with the character a man projects. A man who is calm, cool, collected, comfortable and confident will trump an Abercrombie model every time.

Women DO NOT like bad boys. Not sure who started this rumor, but they must be shot immediately. Women do not sit around with their girlfriends and say “Oh, Marni, I can’t wait to meet a lazy, unreliable jerk who treats me poorly and feeds on my insecurities.” Women like nice guys, not wimps, pushovers or pleasers; nice guys with a backbone and strong sense of self.

There’s no “right” line, but there’s a right way to say it. If I had four men approach me using the same, tried-and-tested pickup line, do you think I would be attracted to all four of them? Maybe, but highly unlikely. I can tell you that if the right man with the right character came up to me and said “banana, banana, banana,” I would giggle like a little schoolgirl and instantly feel attraction for him.

There is never a bad time to approach a woman. Women want to be approached, as long as it’s by the right person. If you see a girl you like, stop, breathe and think to yourself, “She’s adorable. I want to talk to her and see if I like her.” Notice the “I want” and the spirit of figuring out what you like. Until you get to know this girl, it’s about you, not her.

Women want you to respect them, not admire them. So stop putting women you know nothing about on pedestals. Yes, they’re hot, yes other men may want them, but that does not mean that all self-respect gets thrown out the door. Respect yourself first, and women will follow.

So use these lessons as the first step to eliminating the anxiety that “thing” produces. The second part is getting out there and practicing. Sitting on your couch watching “Law & Order” is not going to bring you results with women.

October 18, 2011

How is Google+ for Dating?

Filed under: dating, facebook, google, network, online, people, social — Tags: , , , , , , — admin @ 10:28 am

By Erik Sass

If you have been among the fortunate and happy few to receive a Google+ invite, you may have noticed a pronounced gender imbalance on Google’s not-a-social-network, with many more men than women. And it wasn’t just your imagination: it turns out that 88% of Google+ members are men, according to Google Analytics, compared to 10% for women and 2% for “other.”

In other words, Google+ is a total sausage-fest, at least so far. That’s not terribly surprising, considering that the early invitations circulated in nerdlicious tech circles where Y chromosomes run rampant. It also resembles the adoption curve for some other tech products, which seem to exert an early fascination on a relatively small number of male early adopters before spreading to larger numbers of less-tech-savvy men and women — i.e., going mainstream.

So the real question is how the Google+ gender balance changes as time goes on: if Google+ catches on as a hot new social network, presumably the gender balance will gradually right itself before stabilizing around the roughly 51%-49% female-male proportion of the general population. If Google+ fails to catch on, I would expect both the overall number of users and the proportion of female users to remain small.

All this begs the question: how is Google+ for dating? This might sound like a trivial or flippant concern, but in my humble op-ed it is actually a major issue for any general-purpose social network. Facebook has succeeded by offering features and functionality which (it claims) are relevant to practically every major area of human life, from keeping up with relatives, to sharing pictures with friends, to professional networking, and so on. And one of the most popular uses, whether advertised or not, is meeting people for dating.

Although there are any number of committed online dating sites, Facebook recommends itself for romantic trolling for a number of reasons: it’s free; you can see endless numbers of profiles, and the pool of potential partners for both genders is huge; you can check out photos, interests and other qualities that may be important in a prospective partner (perspective on life, spelling ability); and you can trace connections through mutual friends and acquaintances, which presumably confers some kind of character recommendation, and also gives you something to talk about as an icebreaker. I think Facebook’s online dating functionality is important even for people who are in relationships or don’t think of themselves as “on the market”: Facebook is always there as a fallback if things in their current relationship turn sour, or they decide to get back into dating.

In light of the importance of online dating for social networks, how does Google+ stack up? This is a good question, especially considering that Google has deliberately positioned Google+ as a more private alternative to Facebook, suggesting there may be fewer opportunities for idly browsing the profiles of people you don’t know, and less access to content (e.g. photos) that people look for when canvassing for dates online. Basically, is Google+ any good for checking out hot strangers and getting in touch with them?

October 6, 2011

The Soulmates Dating Service

Filed under: meet, members, people, soulmates, subscribers — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 9:00 am

By Chris Elliott

Since the earliest days of newspapers people have sought to meet one another through the medium of the personal columns. Traditionally people paid to place a pen portrait of themselves in print; replies were often guided to a post office box to ensure privacy.

Come digital evolution and the Guardian has Soulmates, a dating service that has seen a changing cast of 570,000 register as members since its first incarnation on the website in 2004. The churn arises because people come, meet someone and go. It now has 170,000 members.

The Soulmates site is a commercial enterprise, and while it is not about journalism – the subject of most Open door columns – it is about reader engagement on a big scale. Surveys suggest 50% of the people who register are Guardian readers. Soulmates is very clearly a way in which the newspaper enables readers who identify with a particular set of values to meet one another. When things go wrong Soulmates members expect quick results and transparency. Yet since the recent launch of a redesigned Soulmates website many feel they haven’t had that. Indeed, the team behind the revamp has received 5,000 queries and complaints.

One major problem was that soon after the launch on 29 March, around 2,500 emails directed at the address for complaints did not get through. In addition some members who had built up personal histories of correspondence with fellow members lost all the data, and some functions didn’t work properly.

One reader wrote: “I subscribed during the previous ’look and feel’, over a month ago, and am totally frustrated and annoyed that none of my queries and complaints have been answered. I subscribed on the understanding that what I signed up for would be available for the full duration of my subscription. The recent revamp has resulted in reduced functionality, and what is supposedly available isn’t working fully.”

A frequent complaint was: “Why change the site at all?” Another reader said: “Soulmates … has wiped most historic messages to and from other soulmates without warning, thus making contact with them impossible. I have built up contacts with many soulmates through this function and spent hundreds of pounds doing so … You affect to be a liberal and progressive paper. I expect the highest standards of you, including business standards. I have been a loyal reader of the Guardian and the Observer for a quarter of a century.”

The background to the change is that Soulmates was hosted by an external company and the Guardian wanted to bring it in-house and build a new site that was capable of more commercial development. A team of developers worked on it for nine months from July, and carried out what is described as two rounds of “rigorous testing”. A customer services team was trained for four weeks to expect the sort of queries and complaints that are normal when such a fundamental change takes place. It was estimated that the usual daily rate of calls might triple. They were surprised by what actually happened.

Kate Morgan-Locke, the Guardian’s consumer offers and service director, said: “We didn’t expect the numbers we had and we were overwhelmed. We have spent three weeks resolving coding issues [faults in the software] and now, over the next few weeks, we will be restoring the most requested functioning and features. I am just terribly sorry – people have been really angry and frustrated, but really constructive in their responses as well.”

How the site works is that it is free to browse on a guest basis. Those who wish to take the next step put up a profile of themselves – that’s when they become members. It is when they want to email someone they have seen on the site that they pay a fee, and that makes them subscribers. It has been decided to refund cash to subscribers proportionate to the amount of time the site isn’t working. In effect the site will be free to subscribers while the majority of fixes are carried out. (For more details see the FAQs at gu.com/soulmates-has-changed.)

Looking for a date or a partner through the electronic columns of a newspaper is a sensitive decision for someone, taking time and thought. The site is commercially important to the Guardian and the deal to refund subscribers will be expensive, but it is the right thing to do.

The wildest live webcams
Real sex just a click away
Hook up with the hottest men!
Languages: English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Italiano